SSBD™ Blog

What Leaders Get Right Before the School Year Begins

The leaders who build engagement systems that last share something in common. It is not a particular program or a specific strategy. It is a set of decisions they make before the year begins.


Rooted Practice. Sustainable Growth.

Field Notes | Leadership & Values

Published: July 2026 Author: Michele P. Brooks, M.Ed. Pillar: Leadership & Values

The leaders who build engagement systems that last share something in common. It is not a particular program or a specific strategy. It is a set of decisions they make before the year begins, decisions that most leaders make quietly, without fanfare, and that shape everything families and staff experience for the next ten months.

This is what they get right.

They name what they are building, not just what they are doing.

Strong engagement leaders enter the year with a clear picture of what they are working toward, not just a list of activities, but a shared understanding of what engagement is supposed to produce. They can articulate, in plain language, what families should experience by the end of the year and what conditions need to be true for that to happen.

This sounds simple. In practice it is one of the most important leadership acts there is. When leaders name what they are building, they create shared direction. Staff know what they are working toward. Families know what to expect. And when the year gets busy and priorities compete, there is something to return to.

The Systemic & Sustainable by Design™ framework begins with Leadership and Values for exactly this reason. Research consistently shows that districts where engagement holds are those where leadership has made it visible through decisions, not just statements.1 Before the year starts, the right question is: what do we believe about families, and does what we are designing reflect that belief?

Systemic & Sustainable by Design™ gives practitioners a clear read on the system and a practical path for growth. Not another initiative. A structure for sustaining the work.

They decide who is in the circle before the year fills in those decisions by default.

Every engagement system has a circle, the people who carry the work, shape the strategy, and are accountable for outcomes. Strong leaders name that circle intentionally before September arrives and the calendar makes the decision for them.

This means asking: who needs to be part of designing and implementing this work? Is engagement owned by one office, or is it distributed across departments, instruction, student support, communications, special education, early childhood, each with a named role in how families experience the district? Do school leaders and classroom educators see themselves as engagement leaders, or do they see engagement as someone else's responsibility? Are cross-departmental teams structured so that no single office absorbs what should be shared? And are families in the circle as partners or as recipients?

These are not easy questions. But leaders who ask them before the year begins create the conditions for shared ownership. Research on organizational capacity identifies these structural conditions, the ones that allow engagement to hold across schools and leadership transitions, as essential to sustainable practice.2 When educators at every level understand their role in the engagement system, and when departments are organized to carry the work together, engagement becomes durable. Not dependent on one person's commitment or one team's capacity, but held by the system across transitions, across schools, and across the year.

They treat expectations as leadership tools, not administrative tasks.

The districts where engagement holds across schools and leadership transitions are the ones where expectations are clear, shared, and embedded in how the work actually gets done. Not buried in a policy document. Not assumed. Named, communicated, and connected to the structures that support them.

Strong leaders use the summer to ask: do staff know what is expected of them when it comes to engaging families? Are those expectations realistic given what staff have been equipped to do? Are the structures, the routines, the roles, the resources, in place to make meeting those expectations possible?

Expectations without support produce anxiety. Expectations with support produce consistency. That distinction is a leadership choice, and it gets made before the year starts.

The window is now.

Before the back-to-school energy takes over, there is still space to make these decisions with intention. To name what you are building. To bring the right people into the circle. To set expectations that are clear enough to hold and supported enough to meet.

Take the Next Step

Not sure where your system stands? The SSBD™ Quick Scan gives you a snapshot across five dimensions in about three minutes, a starting point for the intentional design work the new year deserves.

Start Your Free Quick Scan →

References

  1. Brooks, M. P., et al. (2019). Taking It to the Next Level: Strengthening and Sustaining Family Engagement through Integrated, Systemic Practice. Institute for Educational Leadership. iel.org
  2. Mapp, K. L. and Bergman, E. (2019). Partners in Education: A Dual Capacity-Building Framework for Family-School Partnerships, Version 2. dualcapacity.org

Share this:

Like this:

Like Loading…